Remains objective about the concept of torture while keeping your lawyer hat on. Dershowitz does this by examining the concept of torture without prejudice. He understands the government's position and what it would look like if they ordered torture, but we cannot allow torture to happen behind the scenes. It's up to us as a society to come together and say what's okay and what's not okay. Dershowitz also goes on to state that torture has been an effective tool in Israel for obtaining information. The United States and Israel are close allies. (Dershowitz, 2006) Did the United States benefit from information obtained through torture from Israel? We are here, one way or another. Understanding that standards are necessary for the betterment of all will minimize extreme or involuntary torture. I agree that torture is inevitable, I also agree that laws could provide a clearer picture for the people involved. Define the measures to be taken when torture is used and clearly identify when it is time to stop. Dershowitz's argument is in line with Stuart Mills' idea of ​​consequentialism. The greatest good of all is taken into consideration in the decision-making process. But Kant would say that legalizing torture does not make it morally right. Legally carrying out torture is still morally wrong and