The jurors had several conflicts in disagreeing with each other and it didn't help that they were yelling at each other. The first real conflict is when 8 jurors voted not guilty versus 11 voted guilty. The other 11 jurors don't seem to want to listen to this man; they don't want to hear why he voted not guilty. Some of these men, Jurors 3 and 7, just want to close the case so they can move on with their lives. They don't think it's imperative enough to look at the evidence and put themselves in the defendant's shoes. They get angry at this man and try to convince him to vote guilty. Another conflict is that some jurors were stubborn and stubborn. They refused to accept the stories proposed by Juror 8 even when they knew he was right. It's a conflict that could have easily been avoided if half of them weren't so disgusting. The decision on the case could have been resolved sooner if it were not for their stubbornness. The most common negotiation used time and time again was to vote for the majority just to get it over with. Some examples could ...