Topic > Analysis of American Democracy in Danger - 1169

I came to America in the year 1994; I was born in Iraq during the regime of Saddam Hussein. My thesis is a positive view of the American government, because I grew up in a place where we had no freedom. When my family came to America, we were able to have opportunities we never could have had. As you know, the concept of “democracy is complicated” (Models of democracy 1). On the first page of American Democracy in Peril by William E. Hudson, the book often gives the exact definition of government or the word democracy. For example, he raised two interesting perspectives on the idea of ​​democracy in America: one is “the dictionary definition, “government (or governance)” (1). One point of view he raises is what "governance" or "governance" really means, it means that government is made by the people and that all the people in the government are directly involved. We will try to debunk some different perspectives involving democracy in the United States. There are many “precursors of modern democratic theory” (3), for example; we all know that the ideology of democracy is a rather ancient relic. I would actually like to refer to an example that Hudson commonly repeated in the introduction of the book. Hudson is referring to the Greeks and how they had a well developed system of successful democratic communities, now the reason he brings this up is because we, as a democratic society, have chosen to emulate the Greek democratic system. Just like us, until recently women and slaves were only allowed to vote for wealthy men (3). Hudson also believed that everyone had natural born rights and that all people should have the same opportunities to be involved in democratic affairs, both locally and nationally. Not only did Hudson agree with this theory, but with many other liberal theorists and they all had two main ones