It would be no surprise that television, the Internet and any other type of advertising from large fast food companies like McDonalds® or Subway® have successfully made progress their ideas of healthy foods in many Americans. Yet all of these wealthy companies, along with many other smaller companies, have many ways to sell their products. These methods may be sneaky and jargon-laden. Simple knowledge information overloaded with confusing and sometimes random information that would otherwise be too insignificant for people to bother learning. There are also times when the information is oversimplified and has no real background to make a worthy judgment. Amidst all the mistakes in the fast food industry, there are reliable sources of information. In recent years there has been an increase in connecting ideas on the transformation of fast food restaurants. While some arguments hold that the reason is one clause over the other, some deviate and move away from the topic. They exercise random facts to make the statement reasonable or by overflowing them with seemingly reliable sources from authoritative figures. Rabin's article “Proximity to Fast Food Is a Factor in Student Obesity” says: Ninth graders whose schools are within a block of a fast food restaurant are more likely to be obese than students whose schools are a quarter mile or more away. , according to a study of millions of schoolchildren by economists at the University of California and Columbia University. (Rabin) There are non sequitur ideas underlying proximity and obesity. The scope of study was limited and it is difficult to draw a conclusion because there is no reliable global link. It is better to research related concepts such as types of food, production and manufacturing, connect with fast food resulting in student obesity. While the idea of ​​proximity to fast food causing obesity is relevant, manufacturing concepts offer better connective experimental data. The study was conducted on ninth graders and schools that are a quarter mile or more away. This creates a weak rationalization. The study also could have easily added a variety of data beyond just ninth graders because if it extended to elementary school, high school, and even college students, as well as different distances, it would provide a reliable and diverse scope. Expanding to different people, races, and age groups offers a more detailed conclusion.