After investigating this case, if Toro decides to take legal action, he will most likely have a good case. Criminal law should be able to be enforced when an atrocity occurs in sports such as football. Competitors should not be exempt from criminal law. Because this damage occurred on the ball, it is more difficult to distinguish between extreme challenges that happen seemingly suddenly and a wild tackle. However, a case like this is best treated as negligence. On the other hand, Lupo has all the credentials to contest the decision taken by the disciplinary commission, as long as he can demonstrate that it was an unfair hearing. Furthermore, he will most likely lose his appeal because his punishment is disproportionate due to the severity of the harm caused. A good example of this is the Roy Keane case of 2002, when he received a £150,000 fine and a five-match ban after deliberately injuring another player (BBC News, 2002). However this is difficult to say, as not all evidence is provided. For example, one important part that is missing is the referee report, which is important, as it will give more insight into the mentality of the players when making the tackle. That's why I gave it