The author uses a good sense of evaluation and understanding. Present the case in an argumentative way trying to show how dangerous it could be. The author focuses more on two churches and tests their faiths. It didn't sound good. Yes, indeed what they do is very dangerous and the children in their church need to be vaccinated for the safety of others. The author is right because practicing your religion while putting other people's lives at risk is not right and should be stopped by the government. The author is giving us an insight into how students with criminal records find it difficult to enroll in a college or university. The author uses a variety of examples from around the world, although his main ideas and arguments focus on New York campuses. My favorite line from the Op-Ed would be: Students stopped filling out their sign-in sheets when they were asked to check off whether they had a criminal record. The weak argument would be for the author to indirectly state, it is safe to have these check-boxes in the question. He shouldn't have said that because it would be a bit like people-pleasing by not allowing students with criminal records to join the group.