Topic > An Opinion on Andrew Jackson's Justifiable Actions as an American President

From an American's perspective, I believe that the actions Jackson took were justifiable. Without his effective dealings with Native Americans, we may not have all the land we have today. He also fought against the Second Bank of the United States along with other banks and businessmen for the benefit of the poor of the United States. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get Original Essay Yes, it took land from Native Americans which can be viewed horribly. From a passerby's perspective, it would appear that the settler came to America to steal land from Native Americans. But this is not the point I am discussing today. Jackson was known by his middle name "Sharp Knife", which he took during the War of 1812. He courageously took command during multiple battles with Native Americans along with opposing powers in the United States, the major decisive battle that earned him his nickname it was the Battle of Horseshoe Bend where the “Red Sticks [were] shattered, 800 to 900 of them killed” (Ripper, 2008). Since the Red Sticks were one of the major Native American forces opposing the United States at the time, their defeat led to a heavy loss of land for the Americans. In total, "thirty-five chiefs signed away millions of acres. Only one of these chiefs was a Red Stick. The others had been Jackson's allies in the war, allies whom Jackson now betrayed" (Ripper, 2008). Not only was Jackson taking land from the Red Sticks, but so were his allies in the war who fought alongside him. For the Native Americans the blow was hard, knowing that they would have to move even further away because of this. To the average American of the time, he was revolutionary, and many loved Jackson for that reason. The United States was still small at the time and traded and stole land from Native Americans in hopes of westward expansion. The United States today would not have been as great as it is if the War of 1812 had not gone in its favor. Jackson then continued his fight against the Native Americans as a major general, one of his great victories was the Battle of New Orleans, "Jackson carried forward old grievances and plans: to punish the Spanish and their Indian allies and take Florida for the United States United" (Ripper, 2008). During his second term as president. He expressed his hatred of the Native Americans surrounding his land, which led him to force the removal of Native Americans, particularly the Cherokee, from Georgia and force them westward. Marshall's Supreme Court ruled against it, but "Jackson would not enforce the Court's ruling" (Ripper, 2008), while controversial, led to a portion of the United States becoming more land, once again expanding the United States United for the benefit of the citizens of the United States. The actions Jackson took against the Bank of the United States also proved beneficial. In “1819, a year of bad banking, a bad year for almost everyone” (Ripper, 2008). For this reason the Bank of the United States tried to limit the flow of money, it began to take measures such as recalling banknotes from other banks to regulate their value. Jackson believed that the federal government should not interfere with state affairs any more than necessary. During Jackson's second presidential term, he essentially killed the Bank of the United States by removing money and placing it in smaller banks that gave more control to the states. He also believed that there were some reasonable uses of federal power, "during his second term, he had to deal with the rogue state of Carolina"?"