Criminal profiling is a strategy used by police and investigators in criminal cases such as rape, murder and kidnapping. However, since the late 1990s criminal profiling has been extended to other criminal cases such as arson, terrorism and burglary. Most people are familiar with criminal profiling from the popular TV shows CSI, Coldcase SVU, Bones and Mindhunters, etc. All these TV shows are great, addictive and exciting and make viewers feel like they are detectives. While watching these shows and how they manage to solve all the different cases with very little/no evidence is amazing, but have you ever taken a step back and thought, if criminal profiling is so great, then why are there so many unsolved cases in the world? And is criminal profiling still relevant? It turns out that all the police around the world use the same 7-step strategy which are: Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original EssayStep 1: Gather all identified evidence from the scene, the victim, the suspect, and other sources.Step 2: All the information gathered is then evaluated. Step 3 - The suspect is then placed into the "organized offender" or "disorganized offender" category, there is a third category which is "mixed offender" for when the suspect cannot be classified into the other two categories. Phase 4 – Reconstruction of the crime. The crime situation is developed as much as possible from the beginning. Phase 5 – Profiling potential suspects. Phase 6 – The statements and alibis of the suspects are collected. Step 7 (final stage) - After appearing in court with all the evidence found, the criminal is convicted and sent to prison. The steps seem to cover cases from start to finish and don't appear to be overly complicated. This strategy has undergone very few changes since it was put in place in 1973, surely if criminal profiling was so badly flawed drastic changes would have been put in place, so it seems that "if it ain't broke then, don't fix it". D On the other hand, there was a study where police evaluated 192 profiles created by the FBI. Of the 192 profiles, 17% helped identify suspects, 83% of police officers thought the profiles. were useful despite the profiles helping to solve only 14% of cases, for a total of 5 arrests out of 184 cases, which gives a success rate of 2.7%. Not great results for criminal profiling in that study how about another study called “Coals to Newcastle, Part 1, study of criminals” by Gary Copson as part of the experiment they took two fully operational police stations, training one to use a new statistical approach to criminal profiling which. had to be strictly respected. The other police station was left alone in continuing to use the normal standard approach to criminal profiling. In the end, the results showed that the police station using the new statistical approach had a 260% more increase in crimes solved than the police station using the standard approach. The standard criminal profiling described is known as the “traditional” criminal profiling technique. However, it would appear that there remains much study and research to be carried out to examine the reliability and validation of criminal profiling. Please note: this is just an example. Get a custom paper from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay The traditional technique seems to be a success or.