Index Situation AnalysisProblem StatementViews and AnalysisAlternative SolutionsSituation AnalysisThe case concerns a young banker named Rob Parson, who was hired for a very demanding job as a market coverage professional by Paul Nasr, a senior managing director of Capital Market Services at Morgan Stanley for his outstanding performance and energetic attitude. Nasr promised to promote him to the position of CEO. Rob Parson did very well and with his efforts pushed Morgan Stanley from 10th position to 3rd in a very short space of time. With its efforts, it has expanded the market share from 2% to 12.5%, demonstrating its outstanding and influential performance. Unfortunately, Rob Parson failed to build good relationships with colleagues and colleagues, which is of great importance for the company. At Morgan Stanley, teamwork was much more important than individual work, and employees were not allowed to violate company rules to achieve a particular goal. In this situation, Rob Parson broke too many eggs to achieve his goals and objectives, which greatly affected his relationships with colleagues and colleagues. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get Original Essay Rob Parson's performance evaluation is ongoing and it has become difficult for Paul Nasr to promote Rob Parson due to many negative opinions. A 360-degree performance appraisal process was implemented at Morgan Stanley where professionals were evaluated by superiors, peers and subordinates. However, Rob Parson did very well in bringing clients to the company, but he had poor relationships with his colleagues and subordinates and they had all commented negatively during his performance evaluation. Rob Parson's activities and qualities are not in accordance with the mission and culture of the organization. In the self-assessment exercise he admitted that he is not exactly suited to the culture of the organization and that it will take him some time to fully adapt. Thinking seriously about all these points, it boils down to what is fundamental to the organization, its company, mission and intended qualities or fleeting profit related to money. Problem Statement Paul Nasr must make the decision to recommend Rob Parson for promotion to the position of CEO. If so, what would be the implications of this decision on the overall policies of the organization? If not, what would be Rob Parson's reaction, could it be possible that Morgan Stanley loses such a competent and high caliber player. The main problem for Paul Nasr was to make a right decision by dealing sophisticatedly with Rob Parson so that he could get his point across. The root cause of the problem was the difference between Rob Parson's thoughts and the company's corporate culture. He does not show respect towards his colleagues, has no aptitude for cooperation and does not consider the importance of employee development, as he believes he is the sharpest of each of them. Parsons' fundamental vision was to create great results through its magnificent execution in capital market services and to create an effective and long-term association with its clients and those of the organization and it is doing the job effectively. It may be possible that Rob Parson is a victim of self-sabotage, where people unconsciously subject themselves to it due to the demanding nature of their work or other reasons. Aggressive feedback regarding a person's unconscious behavior could affect their confidence and”.