Topic > Why not arm teachers

Index Persuasive speech outline The attention phase The necessity phase The satisfaction phase The visualization phase The action phase Persuasive speech outline General purpose: to persuade Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay Specific Purpose: To persuade my audience to sign a petition calling on our government not to arm teachers with guns. Thesis: Arming teachers would undermine their sense of a safe learning environment, divert precious funds from needed school resources, and increase the risk of accidental shootings. The attention phaseA. Attention: Would arming teachers be an effective solution to school shootings? With the increase in school shootings in recent years, lawmakers and the American people have wondered whether this will make a difference in these shootings. But would arming teachers actually make schools safer? B. Meaning: Placing guns in our schools could have a huge impact on our school's operation and performance.C. Relevance: Our students are the future of our society. We need to think critically about the risks and impact that huge changes like this could have on our education system.D. Credibility: As someone who is pursuing a major in Education and has four months of experience in a child care center, I have an understanding of the school environment and have experience managing children. I have also studied this topic for many hours.E. Thesis: Arming teachers would undermine the sense of a safe learning environment, divert precious funds from needed school resources, and increase the risk of accidental shootings.F. Preview: In the next two minutes I'll talk about the negative impact of guns in schools, a solution, and what you can do to prevent it. The Need Phase A. First Main Point The presence of firearms compromises the feeling of a safe and supportive learning environment for students and educators. The responsibility of carrying a firearm places stress on the teacher to ensure that it is properly maintained, protected and stored. This stress can carry over into the classroom, making students feel tense. Arming teachers will diminish students' ability to connect with and trust their school. According to the National Association of School Psychologists, overemphasis on extreme security measures, such as the use of metal detectors and arming school personnel, undermines students' perceptions of the school's ability to provide a safe and supportive environment. effective learning. (National Association of School Psychologists)B. Second Main Point Equipping educators with firearms defunds the necessary supplies and resources schools need to ensure students reach their maximum learning potential. Arming 10 to 20 percent of teachers would cost an estimated $250 million to procure weapons and regularly train teachers, according to director Michael Hansen of governance studies at the Brown Center. This does not include whether teacher pay would increase due to increased responsibilities. Depending on whether they do so, the cost could easily balloon to around $650 million or more. (Hansen 2018) Many schools in the United States currently struggle to provide an adequate amount of necessary supplies and resources to students as this is already due to a lack of funding. In most cases, whatever supplies schools are unable to afford, the costs fall.