Topic > Generation gap: building bridges between generations and reviving lost values ​​

The generation gap is caused by rapid social change in human society. Human beings with their different experiences, occupy different positions, eventually conflicts will arise within the community. Simultaneously with globalization, modern culture in developing countries now pushes human society to change rapidly, both in contacts with the surrounding environment and with other beings, which can ultimately lead to many long-term consequences. My work, which is a fantasy graphic novel, is a portrait of our world with all these current generation gap issues. With generational conflict at the center of the entire story. It questions the attitudes, priorities and unwritten issues in which our behaviors in today's world have been formed. Strike to convey that sense of respect and understanding between man and man. On the other hand, my goal is to remind us to slow down, appreciate and reconnect with the world around us, which is almost forgotten in today's modern world. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get Original Essay Regarding the generation gap, it seems that several generations are facing conflicts in many aspects of life due to modernization. Srudevi K Patil (2014) examined how a generation gap reflects the conflict between modern and traditional sections of modern Indian society. He found that as education and modernization expand, both generations are likely to experience a cultural lag that leaves them behind in areas of modern life or fails to carry forward some of their traditional orientations. This difference in values, beliefs and mentalities has remained the same in the family, in married life and in free time. When the young generation cherishes its independence, the old try to dominate the young. He also found that expanding urbanization, literacy, and industrialization brought distinctive psycho-social changes to the personality structure of individuals who exposed themselves to them. For example, despite knowing the rapidly changing social changes, adults fail to take this into account when interacting with children. As a result, parents often enforce social rules and behaviors from their own generation. Thus conflicts between generations arose as a result of modernization. While, according to research, generational conflicts have appeared under the pressure of changes resulting from the process of modernization of society. Public perception may underestimate its dimensional consequences in a long-term view due to the neglect of these issues in the everyday context. Edward J. Clarke, Mar Preston, Jo Raksin, and Vern L. Bengtson conducted a mail survey to investigate the dimensions of conflict and its effect on the intergenerational parent-adult child relationship. By collecting written comments from parents and their adult children, they collected data and developed categories that can be used to typify intergenerational conflict. In the end, 6 types emerged in relation to conflicts: (1) communication and interaction style, (2) habits and lifestyles, (3) practices and values ​​in raising children, (4) work habits and orientation , (5) politics, religion, and ideology, and (6) family norms or maintenance. It was found that the most frequent intergenerational conflicts are 2: problems in communication and interaction style stand out in a further 32%, followed by disagreement on habits and choicespersonal, mentioned in 32% of the responses. The generation gap here seemed much more consistent with the data. However, the frequency distribution of conflict types was not as striking as expected across child and parent groups. The findings indicated that conflict between these two generations may be more widespread than commonly believed. Throughout their discussion, the potential for debilitating effects of conflict are evident. Maintaining a conflictual relationship causes a continuous drain on emotional resources and will eventually decay into a “bad, long-term relationship.” However, it seems that the long-term consequences of generational conflicts do not stop there, increasing the balance between man and nature. . Gaia Vince (2012) examined human consumption habits after the Great Acceleration. The rapid increase in human activities has led to the increase of everything: carbon dioxide, water consumption, number of cars, deforestation and consumption. When humanity's life is more comfortable now than that of an average human being a century earlier, people buy things they may not need. While this habit of excessive consumption may help governments overreach their economies, it is harming the environment. “In nature, 'resources' are recycled. But the scale at which humans use resources is too rapid for natural systems to handle." On the other hand, Stanley Knick (2010) analyzed the negative aspects of the transition from traditional to modern culture, regarding the sustainability of the living environment and emotional connection. The transition from rural to urban life, which occurred mainly due to the development of mechanized means of production, is the crux of the transition from traditional to modern culture. He found that the constant flow of refugees from modern culture is a sign of the hole in modern culture. Modern culture, despite its seduction and power, has failed to deliver on human desires for connection. Comparing the differences between the two cultures in various aspects: the system, their beliefs in power and relationships with nature and the living environment, the article highlights how modernization has changed the lifestyle and mentality of the humanity. Furthermore, the change in consumer behavior and habits has led to various consequences that endanger the sustainability of today's world. However, the question must be raised: do changes and differences in values, habits and behaviors between generations mean that it is impossible to decode this generational conflict? Despite the uniqueness of each individual and the diversity of standards, human beings still share some commonalities while living. under the same company with a rapid pace of change. Alex Smith (2017) questioned the possibility of bridging the generation gap. The widening gap between levels of Conservative support among the over-65s and those aged 25-34 (from 11% to 34%) has reinforced the picture of the UK's divided generations. Although both groups have many different opinions than the others, they shared many commonalities. By addressing their common problem: loneliness and adaptation in a rapidly changing world, the article pointed a direction to resolve this age gap. Even though many older people have deep roots in their communities, they have few ties, while for the younger group the situation is totally opposite. By spending time and with others, people can learn that they can learn a great deal from those other than themselves. This method has been applied on civil organizations and initiatives in other countries to create conversations..