IndexIntroductionDiscussionConclusionReferencesIntroductionPrejudice, stereotypes and discrimination remain the three main problems in the world today. In an increasingly diverse society, prejudice and discrimination have become normalized and synchronized in our daily lives, continuing to make a difference based on race, sex, ethnicity or gender. Prejudice is considered an unfounded and typically non-constructive attitude towards members of a group. Common attributes of prejudice primarily include negative feelings, labeled beliefs as well as a predisposition to marginalize members of a group (Fiske, 2018). Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay However, some definitions of prejudice given by social scientists usually differ, many of them agree that it involves prejudices, which are typically non-constructive towards members of a certain group. The following people will argue whether the formation of prejudice is inevitable in the context of human society. Discussion Prejudice is seen as a typically unjustified or inappropriate negative attitude towards an individual based only on the individual's membership in that specific social group. For example, an individual may have a biased perspective towards a particular race by sexual category that is generally considered sexist. On the other hand, discrimination is considered as typically negative behavior or actions towards an individual or group of individuals specifically based on sexual categories, ethnic origin, and social class (Marsden and Haag 2016). Liberman, Woodward, and Kinzler (2017) cited an example of racial discrimination, which highlights segregation or disconnection, which was recognized as a system of ethnic segregation, applied in South Africa from 1948 to 1994, where people were not Whites were prevented from casting their votes and lived in detached communities. While, in recent times, women often face discrimination in the workplace while men tend to face discrimination and prejudice in family environments. According to Billig (1985), it is evident to identify two different perspectives of prejudice in the domain of cognitive social psychology. By attributing relevance to a conception, the ways in which prejudiced individuals think are primarily different from the ways in which open-minded people think. Meanwhile, in contrast, one can identify a perspective that argues with this distinction by arguing that, instead of considering prejudice as a distinct thought pattern, it claims that all thoughts tend to focus on acts of prejudice. However, regardless of the contradictory views between these two interpretations of prejudice, these explanations are found in Allport's outstanding work "The Nature of Prejudice". Meanwhile, the authors shared similar thoughts with Allport arguing that the importance of categorization is linked to the cognitive process. Furthermore, Billig (1985), drawing on the relevance of previous studies, assessed that categorization is an important value of reasoning that tends to allow human beings to structure and at the same time offer coherence to the overall understanding of people and the social world. Furthermore, if prejudice is seen as a general outcome of thinking rather than a specific type of perception, then we may see an inevitability effect where individuals face acts of bigotry until they come to think that way. Such relative theoretical acceptanceto prejudices and prejudices can be identified in the field of social psychology. On the other hand, social dominance theory emphasizes individual variances in whether individuals view intergroup associations as a contest in which suitable groupings are organized to subjugate others. Leonardelli and Toh (2015), shared similar thoughts and noted that building on the perceptions of moreFor a few decades, individual differences towards the idea of ​​categorizing prejudice and racism seem to emerge from US researchers with a specialization that perhaps will reduce compared to the distinctive characteristics of the past. Hogg and Vaughan (1995) highlight instances of periods of radically different colonization in one country that stimulated cultural subjects to emerge more easily in the United States than in other nations. It included an obvious and legitimate philosophy of equality under which the American national emphasis was based on individualism, which cited responsibility for prejudices on people in addition to individual independence rights over the distinctive characteristics of the ethnic group. According to Marsden and Haag (2016), social dominance theory with the incorporation of the individual differences perspective emphasized on repeated topics in the exploration of social prejudice, which was seen as the extent of competition between groups. This concern has been a long-standing theme in the interpretation of prejudice and intergroup predisposition. Meanwhile, according to Fiske (2018), theoretical understanding grounded in functional associations typically points to competition and resulting perceived intimidation as primary causes of intergroup prejudice and favoritism. Furthermore, realist group conflict theory established that apparent group rivalry for resources was consequential to the decision to reduce the group's ability to obtain additional possessions. While emphasizing explicit and implicit biases, Leonardelli and Toh (2015) stated that marginalization tends to occur in a specific number of groupings in general, where acts of labeling and prejudice are considered intrapsychic manifestations. This implies that they take place within a person and can vary not only in clarity towards other individuals, but also in the level of knowledge and ideas gathered by the individual that activates the acts of classification and prejudice. Previous research has stated that labeling and bigotry have previously been understood as particular responses associated with beliefs, principles and approaches that people tend to think they possess and consequently regulate these feelings in their face. On the contrary, these obvious, conscious and thoughtful events, hidden acts, prejudices and stereotypes show a deficit of consideration and deliberate activation. On the contrary, an integrated agreement was observed that intrinsic manifestations of attitudes and classifications exist and consistently anticipate certain behavioral patterns, which tend to regulate apparent behavior patterns and labeling. Please note: this is just an example. Get a custom paper now from our expert writers. Get a Custom Essay Conclusion To conclude, when considering explanations for the occurrence of labeling, stereotyping, and prejudice, scholars have discovered several means in which prejudice can be concentrated or even eradicated. At this point, training people to become more compassionate towards members of other groups is an effective method that has presented a substantial result. Furthermore, by imagining in a similar situation, individuals are able to contemplate ways in which they would resist and to. 2019].