The term solidarity according to Merriam-Webster (nd) characterizes the unit as a group or class that produces or is based on communities of interests, goals and standards. The term and ideas were presented by the French sociologist Emile Durkheim in 1893. According to Durkheim, types of social solidarity refer to types of society, which are mechanical and natural social orders. Mechanical solidarity essentially reflects how individuals are associated through comparable work, educational and rigorous lifestyle. Natural solidarity especially shows the association that emerges from the specialization of work and the integration between groups of people that occurs due to modernization and mechanical social orders. Although the individual performs various errands with different qualities and interests, the request and his solidarity rely on each other to carry out their particular activities for the time being, farmers produce vegetables to be cared for in the region and in the area the creation specialized individual develops advanced devices for cultivation. This essay will basically show a short presentation on mechanical solidarity and natural solidarity, it will incorporate the contrasts between these two types of solidarity, the qualities of this solidarity and its effect on the person. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay Mechanical solidarity occurs within small-scale settlements made up of small clusters of family relationships in which conventional qualities and social morals are shifted starting at one age and then to the next age. Mechanical solidarity is somewhat of a pre-industrial social order in which similarities of distinction appear in terms of conduct, beliefs, dialects, and standards. There is no specialization or separation of capabilities between groups living in a similar region. Each part feels associated with group life in a similar way to different individuals since each has an encounter with the world that originates from a strictly based normal culture, which repeats similar perspectives, feelings and actions in each individual. With the word Mechanic Durkheim does not emphasize the machine, he simply implies that people's ways of life are the same and that individuals' experiences and thoughts conflict less. Individuals accept because they have a place with an individual from a similar family. As time passes, these less difficult social orders fade, urban regions develop, and complex divisions of capacity emerge within urban communities, between organizations, and within nation states. Natural solidarity is found in social orders where there is an intricate division of labor and an assorted variety of perspectives, feelings, and actions. No single household, neighborhood, city, or economy can provide everything its individuals need to endure. Economies depend on family and educational institutions to create reliable workers with a range of required aptitudes. There is an extraordinary variety of occupations, racial and ethnic backgrounds, rigid beliefs, and political perspectives. This assorted variety of individuals, groups and organizations is divided into unique but related jobs and skills. Organic solidarity is similar to industrial society. These societies are heterogeneous in behavior, beliefs, languages ​​and principles. Organic solidarity derives from the dependence that emerges from the specialization of work and the correspondence between groups of people, a progress that occurs in modern and industrial societies. It is a social attachment that depends on the dependence on itpeople have from each other in the most developed social orders. Despite the fact that people perform different tasks and regularly have different values ​​and interests, the order and solidarity of society itself is based on their mutual dependence to perform predefined tasks. Thus, social solidarity is maintained in increasingly complex social orders through the interdependence of its segmental parts, for example; the farmer produces food to take care of the workers who produce the agricultural hardware needed by farmers to produce food. Organic solidarity is found in societies where there is a complex division of labor and an assorted variety of methods of critical analysis, feeling and action. No family, neighborhood, city or economy can produce everything its individuals need to survive. Economies depend not only on family but also on educational insights to create reliable workers with the breadth of aptitudes required. There is an extraordinary assorted variety of occupations, racial and ethnic origins, religious beliefs, and political perspectives. This variety of individuals, groups and institutions is made up of particular but interdependent roles and functions. I have come to the conclusion that societies with undifferentiated labor, by which I mean primitive societies, have shown mechanical solidarity while in contrast to these societies with a high division of labor or expanded specialization which implies that modern societies have shown an organic solidarity. The division of labor made workers increasingly strangers to each other but then progressively dependent on each other. Since specialization meant that no single worker would produce an item on their own. In a mechanical solidarity, social attachment and union arise from the homogeneity of people, which means that individuals feel united through comparable work, instructive and rigorous preparation and a lifestyle, which is regularly based on bonds connecting family systems. Mechanical solidarity works fundamentally in “traditional” and small-scale societies. The move to organic solidarity makes cohesion dependent on the dependence that people have on each other in further developed social orders. It originates from the relationship that emerges from the specialization of work and the complementarities between individuals. As Durkheim states, the laws of a society are the most evident image of social solidarity and the association of public activity in its generally exact and stable structure. The legal system controls all parts of society with the aim that they cooperate properly. The type of laws; Repressive and restitutive law is compared with the type of social solidarity. First, the repressive law is identified with the focus of normal awareness, and everyone has an interest in judging and punishing the guilty. Furthermore, compensation law focuses on the victim when a wrong occurs because there are no generally shared beliefs about what harms society. Restitutionary law refers to the organic state of a society and is made conceivable by progressively specific groups in society, for example, courts and legal advisors. However, according to the American researcher Eliot Freidson, the hypotheses on industrialization will generally characterize work with regards to the material universe of innovation and creation. He says such divisions are carried out by a ruling authority without thinking about the social cooperation of its members. Fredson (1976). As indicated by the American humanist Jennifier Lehman, she argues that Durkheim's books contain sexist contradictions.