Free will is the concept that we are willing to have some choice in how we act and assumes that we are liberal in our choice of behavior. Free will has been shown to be an illusion, and determinism is the belief that all behavior has a cause and is predictable. Our behavior is governed by internal or external forces over which we have no control. We can choose how to act, behave, and feel to the extent our brains lead us to believe, which is called “soft determinism.” Soft determinism is the idea that our external or internal forces can make us feel, compel, and ultimately influence us to behave in a certain way, but there is an element of free will in the choices we make and it is not a total illusion. In a debate between free will and determinism, we have determinism. Particularly soft determinism. We say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay The term “free will” has emerged over the past two millennia as a canonical designator for a significant kind of control over one's actions. Some people will say that free will is the only correct answer. Using deterministic arguments to undermine people's belief in free will has led to a variety of negative outcomes, including increased deception and aggression. It has also been linked to a reduction in helping behaviors and lowered feelings of gratitude. We can understand free will because we should always hold ourselves responsible for our behavior and actions. Some go so far as to define “free will” as “the strongest controlling condition necessary for moral responsibility.” A person is morally responsible for performing an action and deserves blame if it is morally wrong. By using determinism we allow ourselves not to take responsibility for what we do and the concept of free will forces us to take responsibility. Determinism is the one belief that many people try to blame for what they do, but in all reality the internal and external forces that you are surrounded by on a daily basis influence your emotional and physical well-being, be it negative or positive. Thus proving that we also have determinism. Soft determinism is to explain how our actions can be predetermined but free. You can predict your reactions to certain events or situations that you may have no control over, such as crying at a movie. He made you feel a way you had no control over and it made you cry. According to the soft determinist, your desires, decisions, and volitions (your entire character) are ultimately determined by other factors that are equally out of your control. Examples, your genetic makeup, your upbringing, and your environment. Some examples of free will are choices such as weather or not committing a crime. Free will would mean that a person is fully responsible for their actions. I understand that you might say, “yes, we are all responsible for our actions.” but there are circumstances where soft determinism comes into play and there are external or internal forces that influence us in making these decisions. For example, something that would influence the crime of theft to be committed is being poor. The person is more likely to steal out of desperation than someone who is wealthy and is not stressed about having to pay all the money they need for items. Not to say that just because someone is poor they will steal and have no control over whether to do so or not, but will have more need and influence (soft determinism)based on the external force/situation at hand. It is to be believed through determinism that our actions and thoughts are controlled by our unconscious. This suggests that determinism removes freedom and dignity and devalues ​​human behavior. It underestimates the uniqueness of the human being and his freedom. But if we are against determinism, we are rejecting the scientific approach to explaining behavior for what it is. We can predict events based on things that may have occurred previously, influencing one's actions and behaviors. Examples such as a hit on the head received earlier in life, recent relationship or work stress, perhaps even a psychiatric problem. This can also be demonstrated through individuals with autism or mental illnesses. Do they really have free will? No, they are controlled by their conscience. Another example is individuals with obsessive compulsive disorder, who lose control of their thoughts and actions, and depressed people lose control over their emotions. People in abusive situations acquire learned behaviors based on their environment. This being the case we do not have complete free will and science proves it. Through depression, OCD, and abuse, free will can be affected by determinism. People with depression and OCD often feel that they are unable to exercise free will due to a lack of control or a depressed emotional state. This is the same with people in emotionally or physically abusive relationships. They fall into determinism because they learn behaviors after years of this abuse. They only know what they have been surrounded by. Their only free will is to find a way to get help. Other people's words or actions affect them and they do not have the free will to stop what that person is doing physically and mentally. There is no way for them to stop getting hurt by the abuse of others. Getting help in situations like OCD, depression, and abuse is the only way people with these chemical imbalances or situations can have true freedom and agency in their lives. In some cases people can't even find a way to get help for these problems, they fall into complete determinism and have no hope. This is the idea of ​​soft determinism because there is always something you can control but it means overcoming it and being honest with your amount of control over a situation, emotion, or behavior. The idea is how you respond to your actions and emotions. You could say it's the two (free will and determinism) against each other or opposites. However, philosophers recognize four possible views regarding the two: both true, both false, and either/or. Compatibility, the theory that both can be true at the same time, is popular, as most people want to believe both. On the other hand, the theory that they are both fake is also popular; because this is what current science seems to imply. Both are very controversial topics. It does not seem correct to say that we have complete free will nor complete determinism. I believe the statement should be identified as whether individuals have a response to those internal and external forces, whether they can partially control them or let them guide their actions and behaviors. This means it can be defined as both or as an element of soft determinism. A person can still have internal emotions that drive their daily behaviors even if they do not display these emotions, physically their consciousness is aware. The term itself.