IndexIntroductionHistory of Exclusionary ZoningProblem OverviewConclusionIntroductionThe problem of poverty has impacted many families across the country and has affected the educational system of schools in countless counties across the United States. The United States has a pervasive, self-inflicted problem that ends up being concentrated poverty. Neighborhoods with concentrated poverty, which have a poverty rate of approximately 40% or higher, lack the resources to provide quality schools, job opportunities, safer neighborhoods, and access to substantial health care. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay. However, there has been an identifiable trend of declining public policies and the number of poor neighborhoods increasing across the United States. Exclusionary zoning is defined as an oft-cited policy that keeps affordable housing out of the neighborhood through land use and building code requirements. While this practice is legal, it is unethical due to its harmful effect that prevents low-income families from having the same access to education and job opportunities found in wealthier neighborhoods. Exclusionary zoning is a common problem that has been illustrated in Montgomery County through the school district's approval of school zoning and its effect on the ability of families to acquire the same educational resources as other areas of Clarksville, Tennessee, who are not that poor. History of Exclusionary Zoning The history of exclusionary zoning dates back to the early decades of the twentieth century and took root as a conduit for racial discrimination. Exclusionary zoning allowed white neighborhoods to thrive with the protection of the law prohibiting minorities from establishing residence in their communities. In a time when racial discrimination was protected by law, exclusionary zoning was not identified as an issue that pitted one class system against another or allowed the poor to acquire resources to achieve success. in 1917 the U.S. Supreme Court faced its first case challenging exclusionary zoning through the settlement of two individuals; a white male and a black male. During this transaction, the white individual sold a home to a black individual, but due to the ordinance passed in that particular city, the black individual was not legally allowed to live in a majority white area. Because of this order, the Supreme Court would question whether or not this violated the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Supreme Court case Buchanan v. Warley would confirm that this state's ordinance violated the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. and was declared unconstitutional. Although this case represented a pivotal moment in the history of minorities and blacks, examples of exclusionary zoning still exist today and can be recognized within school zoning in many districts throughout the counties of the United States. Demographics Clarksville, Tennessee has a population of 146,281 people with a median age of 29 and a median household income of $48,675 with an estimated growth between 2015 and 2016 of approximately 1.85% in terms of population and 3.68% in terms of population. family income. The population of Clarksville, TN is 59.4% White, 22.1% Black, and 10.8% Hispanic, with 11% of the people speaking a non-English language and approximately 97.5% of residents areCitizens of the United States. Clarksville's population includes approximately 16.6 percent of residents living in poverty, which is higher than the national average of 14 percent. Due to the huge poverty problem that exists throughout Montgomery County, I decided to focus on the social problem of school zoning which has caused an imbalance in the school system.educational resources that children receive. Overview of the Problem The Fair Housing Act was enacted to prohibit discrimination based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, and familial status, but it did not prohibit discrimination based on class. This was used as a loophole for discrimination that confined low-income people to certain neighborhoods. I have noticed that there are areas in Montgomery County that are poorer than others, and the schools in those areas reflect the poverty their residents encounter. Before the Montgomery County School Board approved the proposed rezoning, parents could enroll their children in any school regardless of their residential address. However, once the school board approved the proposed zoning change, it stated that a child must enroll in a school, in Montgomery County, that is in their residential zone zone. School zoning is a concrete example of the effects of exclusionary zoning and how it can prevent children from receiving the same educational resources as others. Pete Rodrigue stated in his article on exclusionary zoning that it limits poor families' access to good schools and is even linked to harming the academic success of low-income students (2016). School zoning may not be perceived as a disadvantage to students who attend. schools in Montgomery County, but there are many factors that contribute to the issue of school zoning and its effect on student academic success. The four main factors affecting the social problem of school zoning include: lower revenue for schools located in poorer residential areas, a lower academic achievement percentile for students in elementary through high school, exacerbation of socioeconomic segregation through of residential zoning models. division by both race and income that limits strategies to increase socioeconomic school integration. School zoning also limits the school choices of low-income families based on the fact that the quality of a student's school is determined by his or her zip code and by emphasizing that because his or her parents live in "crappy" neighborhoods, a child must attend “lousy” schools. The disparities I have discovered within this social problem relate to socioeconomic class, ability level, and even race. Exclusionary zoning suggests that children can only attend elementary, middle, and high school that is in their residential area. However, if the child lives in a poorer area of ​​town, such as New Providence or 41-A in Clarksville, it is clear that that child's school receives less funding than areas such as Sango or Rossview. A child's education should not be less than that of any other child just because his or her school is in one part of town and/or his or her parents' income is less than that of another child. The school zoning proposal was not expected to be successfully implemented by the Montgomery County school districts in Clarksville, Tennessee. Each year the school district is allocated a certain amount of money for?.