The company I chose to write this article about is Google's Code of Ethics (COE) to determine whether it meets corporate social responsibility (CSR) requirements and complies with mandates legal and implications in case of non-compliance. Google's code of ethics does not comprehensively cover its commitment to corporate social responsibility. Although it specifies employees' obligations, including ethical principles and values, as well as behavior in the workplace, it does not mention ways in which the company would contribute to the protection of the environment, the improvement of social services in society and the financial gain for the employees. government and employees. It does not specify whether the company will be responsible for the impact it has on society, the environment and the economy. Google's COE complies with legal mandates. The company explicitly states the company's commitment and obligations regarding compliance with established laws and regulations. Describes the various laws on competition, insider trading and anti-corruption. The code also defines the responsibility of employees in compliance with the laws and listed corporate values ​​that govern the company. The code of ethics covers workplace conduct, the ethical principles that employees and other stakeholders should abide by. All businesses have a legal obligation to comply with the laws, regulations and standards that govern their business. Failure to follow federal and state guidelines can have serious consequences. In addition to changing the company's legal status, failure to comply exposes the company to lawsuits, government hearings, enormous fines and punishments, or even company dissolution. Google has developed a precise mechanism for reporting violations. Has adopted an anti-retaliation policy that allows employees to feel confident in reporting any violations of company policies, code or legal mandates. It has an ethics and compliance committee that handles cases of employees who believe they are being retaliated against for reporting violations. The second ethical safeguard concerns ways to avoid conflict of interest. The code of ethics lists potential areas where such problems could arise and provides guidance on how employees can address such situations. Prevents employees from engaging in an activity that leads to a conflict of interest and encourages them to review the matter with their managers, as well as the ethics and compliance committee. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay A COE is an effective tool that companies use to develop an ethical culture. Google's COE supports the development of ethical behavior in the organization. As a written code, it provides guidelines and expectations for employee conduct. Explains ways employees can avoid conflicts of interest and steps they can take to address such issues. The COE further specifies workplace conduct and highlights the company's commitment to being an equal opportunity employer and creating a positive work environment. It also provides guidelines on how employees can serve customers by respecting integrity, being responsive and helpful, respecting privacy, and taking action. Beyond that, the COE requires employees to observe financial integrity in recording transactions, hiring vendors, reporting and spending company money. Overall, the COE specifies the consequences of not following the guidelines. Consequently, it supports the development of an ethical culture. Employees raise ethical questions or concerns by contactingtheir managers, the ethics and compliance committee or human resources representatives. They can also raise their concerns through the Ethics and Compliance Helpline or through a government agency. Employees have various resources they can use to raise ethical issues. They include managers, human resources representatives, or the Ethics and Compliance Helpline. Among these resources, the ones I would probably use if they were the Ethics and Compliance Helpline and the Human Resources Representative. The organization remains committed to ethical and legal behavior. We ask everyone to comply with all relevant laws and regulations and the company's ethical standards. This policy explains how to report unethical concerns. Before making a report, make sure that: You have good faith intentions You believe that a violation of laws or ethical guidelines has occurred You believe that the reporting action will help the company comply with relevant laws and regulations. You can report in writing or orally to your line manager, human resources representative or ethics and compliance committee, or via a helpline. The reports should contain sufficient information to assist in the investigation. If you believe you have followed the steps above, but no action has been taken, please contact your board chair. Any report or concern will be investigated in the strictest confidence, but in some situations the organization may disclose the issue to address or prevent similar issues in the future. No one will suffer retaliation for speaking out, whether in terms of discrimination, threats or dismissal. Anyone who threatens another employee for disclosing information or reporting a problem will be subject to disciplinary action which could lead to dismissal. However, the non-retaliation policy would not apply if the report was made with malicious intent. The company secretary and legal counsel are responsible for enforcing the policy. Anyone with concerns about this should direct them to the Compliance Office. Whistleblowing has several advantages and disadvantages that a person must decide before reporting. Highlight negative business practices that could damage the company's reputation or subject the organization to financial losses if the assets go undetected. Therefore, paying whistleblowers discourages organizations or individuals from engaging in fraudulent activities because they risk being exposed and punished for the same. Awarding monetary rewards encourages other people to disclose information and ultimately leads to enforcement. While whistleblowing can expose bad practices, it can be a costly endeavor in terms of fines or lengthy court cases. Some cases often lead to criminal charges which in turn reduce employee motivation and damage a company's reputation. Furthermore, paying whistleblowers can cause problems in organizations because some individuals might be motivated by the financial benefits. It could lead to malicious reporting by uninformed and opportunistic individuals or parties which may lead to unfair accusations of innocent parties. Another negative aspect of paying whistleblowers comes from the fact that only a few individuals can receive the rewards, while the majority of whistleblowers who provide information that does not lead to enforcement receive nothing. The money paid to those who make disclosures is for the public. It is obtained from sanctions and disgorgements in the enforcement activities of the SEC. Therefore, the money that investors have lost due is used for/