The Vietnam WarMark Lawrence Atwood is currently director of graduate studies at the Clements Center for National Security in Austin at the University of Texas. Associate Professor of History and Distinguished Research Fellow at the Roberts Strauss Center for International Law and Security. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay Mark Atwood received his bachelor of arts from Stanford University in 1988 and his doctorate from Yale in 1999. Since enrolling in the University of Texas, History department in 2000, the author has published two history books: The Vietnam War: A concise international history (2008) and Taking on the Burden: Europe and America's Engagement in the Vietnam War (2005). In this history book, Mark Lawrence traces centuries of effort in the small southeastern nation. The author begins with the first-century Trung sisters' struggle to usher in Chinese rule, to outline how America, in Vietnamese perception, was now another in a long line of ultimately overwhelmed enemies. The author finds Sister Trung's divine heir in Ho Chi Minh, a socialist activist who declared the Declaration of Independence before finding himself fighting an American-backed South Vietnamese uprising. This book stands up to its attainable billing and short nature, although there is generally little information regarding the other major players in the “war,” China, the Soviet Union, and France; by far an America-centric story, the narrative is based on major events in the United States from the Gulf of Tonkin settlement in 1964 to the fall of the American embassy in 1975. The author shines in outlining how Johnson Lyndon followed by Nixon and Then Kissinger struggled in vain to find an acceptable reason to withdraw. In a confirmation that modern readers see as familiar, the three leaders repeatedly stressed that retreating without victory would result in shame before the world and strengthen their enemies. From the book, Lawrence points out that the opposite eventually happened and America's popularity declined further the longer Americans fought. Furthermore, neither communism nor North Vietnam prospered after the withdrawal of the Americas. The author points out that the opposite happened. America's popularity plummeted as they fought in the war, and later recovered. Neither North Vietnam nor communism prospered after their withdrawal. Furthermore, the book accurately considers both the short-term and long-term origins of the battle. The author analyzes the growth of Vietnamese communism in the early 20th century and shows how the Cold War discomfort of the 1940s and early 1950s set the United States on the path to intervention. Certainly the book deals above all with the "American war", which ranges from the overthrow of South Vietnamese President Diem Dinh to the odious effects of Tet on American public opinion, to Richard Nixon's expansion of the war into Laos and Cambodia, to Lyndon's withdrawal from presidential contest of 1968 and the challenging peace agreement of 1973, which finally ended American military participation. Please note: this is just an example. Get a customized document from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay Conclusion The book examines the difficult outcome of the battle, its lasting legacy in American films, books, and political discussions, as well as Vietnam's struggle with intense economic and social tribulations. The narration of.
tags