We are all immigrants. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay Some may have wondered: What is an immigrant? With everything that's been going on in the news, like President Trump wanting to build a wall between Mexico and the United States of America to stop immigrants, to our sad local reality of xenophobic attacks against immigrants within our borders . You might look up the definition of immigrant, a noun, defined as “a person who comes to live permanently in a foreign country.” This is a basic definition, since there are even four types of immigrants. The claim that we are all immigrants is a rhetorical statement that does more harm than good. The term “we are all immigrants” was developed in a hasty reaction to the 1960s movements against colonialism, neocolonialism, and white supremacy in the United States of America. America. Those in power at the time offered multiculturalism, diversity, and affirmative action in response to calls for decolonization, justice, reparations, social equality, and an end to imperialism. This was also to verify that the story would be accurate. What grew out of these ideas would replace the notion of a country founded on colonialism but that of a narrative that we are all immigrants. While this may have started in the 1960s in America, it has become a familiar tale today as well. This narrative has evolved over the years finally culminating to include the indigenous peoples of various countries around the world. Historians and liberals say that even the indigenous people are not so indigenous, that they even emigrated from Africa to various parts of the world. This serves to undermine the natives of a country. They even claim that many Africans residing in African countries have all migrated back and forth and are not indigenous even to their own country of residence. The theory that liberals use to support these claims is known as the “Bering Strait Theory of Indigenous Migration.” It has been criticized as a flawed theory, but is still used. Using Native Americans as an example of this theory, they classify them as America's first immigrants followed by the English. Africans, Irish, Chinese, Eastern and Southern Europeans, Russians, Japanese and Mexicans. What this narrative does is that it misrepresents European colonization of countries like South Africa, the United States, and India as examples. Therefore, by making everyone immigrants, it hides the fact that the first settlers were colonial settlers, just as they were in Africa and India, or the Spanish in Central and South America. The difference between a settler and an immigrant is that a settler moves to a new land or country before it is populated, while an immigrant is one who arrives after a country and its populations are well established. Most of these countries listed were Anglo-Saxon empires, founded on settler brutality towards indigenous groups. As European settlers increased, the indigenous people moved away and moved into other indigenous groups for protection. Anglo settlers with enslaved Africans took over indigenous farmlands for plantation agriculture. Bring indentured Indian workers for sugarcane plantations. Although it can be argued that all of us could be descended from an immigrant or that our origins do not belong to the country we may be in. However, blanketing everyone with this uniformity of being an immigrant takes away the virtue and value that the natives have gone through. Taking the transatlantic slave trade as an example. You can see it by saying.