The most obvious example of the dangers of over-immunization is when the reader discovers that El Tano, Gustavo, and Urovich are the people who have remained dead in the pool throughout the entire novel. We come to discover that they had actually committed suicide, a subject in which Virginia mentions early in the novel of a previous resident of Antieri who had also committed suicide: "se había volado los sesos". Unable to escape the economic crisis and the thought of having to leave La Cascada, the three men make a suicide pact so their families can continue to live inside the gates. 'To the best of every day, every year, when others handle this country, something changes and we are a serious country, but it's going to be late, we don't want to keep edad to enjoy it [...] but we can save our family from the caída'. El Tano blames the state for all his problems when in reality it is El Tano himself who is guilty of distancing himself from society. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay In "Pizza, Birra Faso", Cordobés, Frula and Megabom also end up dying. Despite the polar opposite lives of the characters in both texts, their fates ended up being the same, yet the characters died for different reasons. In the novel, the characters are overly immunized to the point that the thought of no longer living within the walls of their gated community is so overwhelming that they must end their lives, since they are so accustomed to life there. In the film, however, the characters die due to the inability to immunize themselves against modernity despite their attempts and due to the collapse of the national community that left them alone. In the last scene the directors intentionally place the camera at the back of the boat so that the viewer can see Cordobés dying with the blurry city in the background watching him as if placing blame on the state and highlighting the disconnect between the city and its citizens. Immunity, although intended to protect life, ends up destroying it, since it destroys the "communitas" on which our existence is based. If this foundation of our existence is destroyed, we too will be destroyed. So, to conclude this essay, the immunization paradigm can explain the destruction of society, its communities and urban life in Buenos Aires. I made clear the challenges of urban life in Argentina at that time; privatization, unemployment, top-down corruption, inflation and crime have contributed to widening the already existing gap between rich and poor. The Argentine government's attempt and subsequent failure to urbanize in the run-up to the 2002 economic crisis created an urban environment characterized by fear and uncertainty. Please note: this is just an example. Get a custom paper from our expert writers now. Get Custom EssayOf course when humans or animals feel fear, their first instinct is to protect or immunize themselves. The destruction of the national community occurred because those who moved into gated communities withdrew their contributions to the national community due to this fear and desire for protection. Piñeiro's novel provides an example of a community that over-vaccinates and the dangerous effects this has on the community and its individuals. On the other hand, Caetano and Stagnaro's film presents the viewer with the opposite perspective, we see the point of view of those who are considered 'the disease' and the unfortunate consequences this has on their lives. Furthermore, the film shows the boys' nonconformity as a strategy to avoid or.