This essay will examine the scene where Maire and Yolland finally kiss, taken from Brian Friel's play “Translations” and Louis MacNeice's poem “Meeting Point” to discuss of how both authors present love as something that transcends universal boundaries: in Friel it transcends the boundaries of language and words; and in MacNeice it transcends the boundaries of time and space. Transcendence is therefore more human in Friel, and more physical in MacNeice. Both writers use repetition to present their ideas. In Friel, the repetition is lighthearted and connects the characters Maire and Yolland, despite their inability to communicate in the conventional sense. In MacNeice, repetition interrupts the flow of time, suggesting that love has suspended its inexorable passage. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay The repetition in the “Translations” scene initially creates a painful and circular linguistic pattern, showing the plight of the characters trapped in a state of uncommunicative and irrelevant dialogue. The characters repeat each other ("Earth...Earth", "George...George") and repeat each other's phrases ("Oh my God...Oh my God", "Say anything. I love the sound of your speech…Say anything to everything. I love the sound of your speech”). While this repetition highlights their plight, it also emphasizes the fact that it is a shared situation, with dramatic irony that it makes the repetition even more obvious to the audience who are aware of the fact of the repetition while the characters are not. They share the same misfortune and, as we see, the same emotions ("the uselessness... the uselessness"). humor to the tragic fact that, although these two characters love each other, they are unable to communicate their feelings in any conventional way due to the constraints of language they do not need to communicate in any conventional way: their feelings are communicated despite the fact that the words have no literal meaning for the recipient. Both characters emphasize that they "love the sound" of the other's "talk," and simply listening to each other talk makes them both "smile." In fact, even if they cannot understand each other, they claim to "know" what they "are saying". In fact, the moment in the scene in which the words have only a literal meaning, when Maire speaks "as if English were her language", leads to "misunderstandings" and the characters drifting apart, rather than "bringing closer". "as before. This provides a visual representation of characters “drawing closer” through a deeper understood meaning and “distancing” when speaking only literally. Friel demonstrated how love is able to transcend the boundaries of language and words to allow two people to communicate their love in a language neither of them can understand. MacNeice employs repetition in his poem, but rather than evoking a situation of inability to communicate, it represents a transcendence of conventional perceptions of time. Time is usually linear, a process of incessant change in MacNeice's poetry, the structure of time does not flow in a linear progression, but is composed of many circular cycles. Each stanza is 5 lines long, with the 5th line an exact repetition of the 1st °.In addition to intra-stanza repetition there is also inter-stanza repetition, with the refrain "The time was far away" at the beginning, middle and end of the poem. Indeed, it is this refrain from “The Time Was Far Away” that spells out the poem's message that love can.