Topic > Essay on Leon Trotsky - 895

This statement is extremely accurate in relation to Leon Trotsky. Trotsky, as recognized by Lenin in his will, was the most talented man in the committee to hold the highest office, yet in hindsight historians "cannot conceive how he would be able to do so" (Pipes). Although Trotsky possessed talent and leadership skills, as demonstrated in his career as a War Commissar where he won the Order of the Red Banner, his political position limited his influence in the power struggle between himself and Stalin. Furthermore, Trotsky did not have the public image that Stalin had, "he lost to the man with a superior understanding of Soviet public life" (Service). Therefore, it is these factors of an individual's political role and public image that take priority over the party leadership's decision rather than talent as a politician. Trotsky's career as a war commissar illustrated his abilities to lead, command and organize a body of individuals, it is undeniable that he had what it took to be an exemplary leader. His militarization of grain requisitions, the use of blockade units in battle tactics, the establishment of field courts to counter the massive desertion problem who had the power to issue the death sentence, his liquidation of the manifesto of the Kronstadt sailors as “petit-bourgeois demands” (Trotsky) and their subsequent massacre by sixty thousand of his own troops and his defense of Petrograd in 1918 all illustrate his ability to be a ruthless and successful leader in Russia , and someone suitable to succeed Lenin. However, Trotsky lost the power struggle because Stalin was the only member who had influence in all three branches of government; Polyburo, Orgburo and Secretariat as General Secretary, a decision put forward by Lenin... middle of paper... a natural target for the Bolsheviks who keep an eye on Lenin's position, and therefore his political end cannot be only his fault, rather The ambition of other Bolsheviks driven by the "tall poppy syndrome" plays a significant role. Trotsky demonstrated talent and skill in his political career, but this alone was not enough when it came to deciding on Lenin's successor. Political role, public image, the ability to manipulate legislation and one's political conviction to adapt it to circumstances are the main factors that come into play in the struggle for power. Trotsky's firm belief in "permanent revolution", despite its discretization, and lack of alliances until it was too late prevent him from being in a position to assume leadership. Ultimately, Trotsky's skill and talent were irrelevant in deciding who succeeded Lenin and took his place as holder of the highest office in the land..