This question is divided into two parts: the first concerns the different processes that change the law that need to be examined and the second is the question that the judiciary does not also changes, actively legislate in an opportunistic way. To evaluate these two questions we need to explain the different processes that lead to law reform, a look at the parliamentary system in making laws and amending them, the judicial system will be reviewed to examine the impact it has on law reform and how it does so. interpret laws and establish precedents through their interpretation. Institutions established by the state, such as the legislative committee, must be evaluated for their contribution to changing the law. External institutions such as the EU will need to be examined to see the role they play in changing laws in the country and how the justice system is affected by the changes. To establish the connection of the justice system with changing laws, it is first necessary to establish who should create laws. Laws should be created through a democratic process, they should be implemented by the government in parliament as it has political legitimacy in the state. This makes Parliament the most important source of law as it is made up of elected parliamentarians. If the people of the state do not like the laws of the country, they can vote for a different government in the state that has similar views to their own. The reason why the judicial system should not change the laws is that the judicial system is independent from other organization and this is an essential part in the functioning of the judicial system. This allows the judiciary to "not be involved and not have any personal interest in benefiting the case they are working on, so as to enforce the law and not create it" (unit 26, ... half of the document .... ..in the creation and modification of laws. A citizen of the State believes that his rights have not been respected can turn to the Court of Strasbourg to deal with his case. This demonstrates the great influence that the EU has in the laws of the State Judges at the Strasbourg court ordered UK judges to make their decisions on precedents issued by EU courts. The judiciary is important in the legislative process as it has an important secondary role in making laws enforce the laws that they are created by parliament, the judiciary enforces these laws by creating precedents and these in themselves become a kind of law. This question about the role of the judiciary mentioned is one I agree with. The judiciary creates law only through opportunistic ways of interpreting the law and is excluded from the process since it is not elected by the citizens of the state.