It's difficult to get a clear account of the sound from a music review. Since ratings differ from one individual to another, it is almost insurmountable to decide whether your conclusion will be congruent with the reviewer's. Further elaboration on their predilection for other artists, genres, or albums is necessary to establish a median where the reader can gain a generalized perspective of their opinion. For example, comparing “Review: Daft Punk's new album 'Discovery'” on Opposing Viewpoints in Context and “Daft Punk – Discovery” on RollingStone.com, you get two very contrasting views of the band Daft Punk's album “Discovery” . Authors maintain alternative reviews respecting their tone, content and point of view. Reading multiple reviews, understanding the writing style, and getting more details about the reviewer's bias is crucial to getting a solid understanding of whether you agree with their review. "Review: Daft Punk's New Album 'Discover,'" for example, included informative details about the artists that make up the band Daft...
tags